November 6, 2010

Condors Nov. 3rd - Nov. 5th

Nov. 3- Condors [RW] Morency got a hat trick, and the Condors move into first place in the Pacific Division. The Condors beat back the Alaska aces with a 5-4 win.
Nov. 5- Condors play in Stockton again the Thunder.
Stockton took a shutout victory of 7-0.

Note: [C] Rylan Kaip was called up by the Houston Aeros.
The Condors are again tied with 4 wins/4 loses.
LETS GO CONDORS!

Condors Oct. 16th - Oct. 30th

Oct. 16- Big Opening Night Crowd Of 6,871 fans!
-Condors fall in thriller, 4-3 to the Las Vegas Wranglers.
Oct. 22- The Condors first win of the season.
-Condors shutout the Utah Grizzlies.
Oct. 23- The Condors tied it up in the 3rd, but lose the game.
-The Utah Grizzlies get revenge with a 6-4 win.
Oct. 28- The Condors battle the Wranglers again.
-The Bakersfield Condors win 2-1.
Oct. 29- Condors battle the Stockton Thunder.
-Condors fight with a 5-4 shootout win!
Oct. 30- Adam Courchaine stopped 33 shots for his first professional shutout.
-Condors shutout 3-0 by the Alaska Aces.

Condors stand at 3 wins/3 loses.
All of the loses were on Saturdays. ??

October 11, 2010

Condors Oct. 9th -Preseason

The Wranglers shutout and out-shoot the Condors.
It was an embarrasing first home game. At least it was pre-season.
On a good note; It was great to see Andrew Ianero out there again. It is his sixth season playing for the Condors and he has quite a good "record". I hope he doesn't retire until he is #1.
The season officially starts on Saturday Oct. 16th. I will be there!
GO CONDORS!

October 7, 2010

Condors Oct. 7th -Preseason

Bakersfield Condors thump the Las Vegas Wranglers 5-2 in preseason game 1. Game 2, in Bakersfield on Oct. 9th, will finish the preseason.
Regular season starts on Oct. 16th at 7:00 PM against the Wranglers.

September 18, 2010

Bible Time

Darwins Theory of Evolution??
According to what I read in Science Illustrated [March/April 2010], maybe not.
Blue highlights are mine to show relevance to my opinion.

In a letter to the editor, Richard J. Erdiac, Jr. said:
"Origins of a Revolution in Hardcover" [November/December 2009] was most interesting. In the 1926 authorized edition of The Origin of Species, however, the final sentence actually reads: "There is grandeur in this view of life, with it's several powers, having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being evolved." By editing the quote [to remove "by the Creator"], you continue to foster unnecessary debate between science and religion.

The editors replied:
Darwin added "by the Creator" to the books second edition. Modern edits of his first edition, the articles subject, do not include these words, according to science historian Ronald Numbers of the University of Wisconsin.

Since Darwin chose to add "by the Creator" to the second edition, shouldn't we respect his choice? Obviously not, according to the editors comment, modern scientists use the first edition. I suppose it helps with THEIR "THEORY OF EVOLUTION", not to use the second edition. They love to tell us what Darwin wrote and studied, but they don't want us to know what he thought. Darwin believed that we were "originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one...".

Something to think about, isn't it?